À proposConditionsConfidentialitéContact
 
Actualisation
The High Court Report

The High Court Report

SCOTUS Oral Arguments
Date de sortie : 2025-12-01
© Copyright 2025 The High Court Report
The High Court Report - QR Code
LibreNew
371 épisodes
Audio
Écouter sur Apple Podcasts
LibreNew
371 épisodes
Audio
Écouter sur Apple Podcasts
Date de sortie : 2025-12-01
© Copyright 2025 The High Court Report
L’épisode le plus récent
Oral Argument: Urias-Orellana v. Bondi | Asylum Authority Showdown: Cartel Violence and Court Deference

Oral Argument: Urias-Orellana v. Bondi | Asylum Authority Showdown: Cartel Violence and Court Deference

Urias-Orellana v. Bondi | Asylum Authority Showdown: Cartel Violence and Court Deference | Oral Argument Date: 12/1/25 | Docket Link: Here OverviewIn this case, the Supreme Court must decide whether federal courts must defer to immigration officials whe
Durée : 59:22
Lecture
Urias-Orellana v. Bondi | Asylum Authority Showdown: Cartel Violence and Court Deference | Oral Argument Date: 12/1/25 | Docket Link: Here
OverviewIn this case, the Supreme Court must decide whether federal courts must defer to immigration officials when determining if undisputed facts constitute "persecution" under asylum law, or whether courts should make independent legal determinations. The case involves a Salvadoran family who fled years of cartel violence, including death threats and physical attacks, but were denied asylum when the Board of Immigration Appeals concluded their experiences didn't rise to the level of persecution. This decision will affect hundreds of thousands of asylum cases and could reshape the relationship between agency expertise and judicial review in immigration law.
Oral Advocates:
For Petitioner (Urias-Orellana): For petitioners: Nicholas Rosellini, San Francisco, CAFor Respondent (United States): For respondent: Joshua Dos Santos, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
Link to Opinion: TBD.
Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD.
Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD.
Timestamps:
[00:00] Oral Argument Preview
[01:10] Oral Argument Begins
[01:20] Petitioner Opening Statement
[03:25] Petitioner Free for All Questions
[26:30] Petitioner Round Robin Questions
[35:09] Respondent Opening Statement
[38:39] Respondent Free for All Questions
[54:30] Respondent Round Robin Questions
[54:41] Petitioner Rebuttal
Id. d’épisode : 1000739191163
GUID : 3b3d916e-aa9d-4b84-812d-73664116baef
Date de publication : 1/12/2025 à 21:30:00

Description

The High Court Report makes Supreme Court decisions accessible to everyone.
We deliver comprehensive SCOTUS coverage without the legal jargon or partisan spin—just clear analysis that explains how these cases affect your life, business, and community.
What you get: Case previews and breakdowns, raw oral argument audio, curated key exchanges, detailed opinion analysis, and expert commentary from a practicing attorney who's spent 12 years in courtrooms arguing the same types of cases the Supreme Court hears.
Why it works: Whether you need a focused 10-minute update or a deep constitutional dive, episodes are designed for busy professionals, engaged citizens, and anyone who wants to understand how the Court shapes America.
When we publish: 3-5 episodes weekly during the Court's October-June term, with summer coverage of emergency orders and retrospective analysis.
Growing archive: Oral arguments back to 2020 and expanding, so you can hear how landmark cases unfolded and track the Court's evolution.
Your direct line to understanding the Supreme Court—accessible, thorough, and grounded in real legal expertise.**

Adresse du flux

https://feeds.captivate.fm/scotus-oral-arguments/

Apple Podcasts : Avis des utilisateurs

Pas d'entrée